NHTF Q&A

Q: Which strategy(s) are typically most advantageous to rural areas with very low market rents?

A: Ginger: We have used cross subsidies in low rent markets with deep capital subsidies. For example, we did a project with 20% of the units at 30% AMI and 80% of the units at 50% AMI in Spokane, which has low AMIs and low rents. This worked fine because almost all of the capital costs were covered by HOME funds, which were structured as a loan with cash flow contingent repayment (we only repay to the extent cash flow is available). The NHTF’s ability to cover operating costs should help quite a bit in rural areas where you might need only modest operating subsidies for it to work. In other words, if you could serve the target population with a $100 – $200 per unit per month operating subsidy, then the NHTF could fill that gap.

Nancy: Developing 100% affordable developments with rents set at 30% AMI and below on 20% of units, 40% AMI on 30% of units and 50% AMI on 40% of units.

"This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use of this email by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately, and delete the material from your computer."

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s