50th Anniversary of the Fair Housing Act

Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Fair Housing Act of 1968

In April 2018 we celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Fair Housing Act. The Oklahoma Coalition for Affordable Housing and other industry stakeholders joined together at events across the state that promote training and education of our housing professionals.  We curated all the latest and best information for you on this page!

Article on Social Media Advertising and Fair Housing


Disability Update 2018: Design & Construction


Community Prevention: Violence Prevention, Behavioral Health & Housing Inequality

Oklahoma Health Equity Campaign: Housing and Health Position Statement


Flowchart: Who Pays for Reasonable Accommodations

Joint Statement on Reasonable Accommodations

Reasonable Modifications Under the Fair Housing Act

TWC Reasonable Accommodations and Accessibility Training


HB3282: 2018 Bill Related to Service Animals in Rental Properties

Service Animals

Reasonable Accommodations Help Ensure Equal Access for Persons with Disabilities

Persons with disabilities may need reasonable accommodation in rules, policies, practices, or services in order to access and enjoy a dwelling. In some cases, treating a person with a disability exactly the same as others may not ensure they have equal access, and treating them “differently” may be the accommodation they need.

As a reminder to the housing community, responses to reasonable accommodation requests must be provided within a reasonable amount of time, generally not to exceed 14 calendar days. The response must either be to grant the request, deny the request, offer alternatives to the request, or request additional information to clarify the Reasonable Accommodation request. Should additional information be required and an interactive process is necessary, this process must also be completed within a reasonable amount of time. An undue delay in responding to a reasonable accommodation request may be a failure to provide a reasonable accommodation.

Example: A resident requests to move their rent due date to coincide with their social security disability check. It would not be considered reasonable to wait 14 calendar days to respond to this request.

Example: A resident requests a designated accessible parking space. An individual’s Disability status and the connection to the Reasonable Accommodation request are not clear. Documentation must be requested within 14 calendar days to clarify the resident’s request, engaging in an interactive process to determine the nature of the request and the needs of the resident.

Example: An applicant with a Disability requires a service animal to alert of impending seizures. The shelter has a no pets policy. It would not be reasonable to wait 14 calendar days to respond to this request.

Requests for reasonable accommodations are addressed in 24 C.F.R. 100.204 – Reasonable accommodations. The Code information provided by the US Government Publishing Office includes examples for parking spaces and service animals as illustrations of applications of the Code. See https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2004-title24-vol1/xml/CFR-2004-title24-vol1-sec100-204.xml

More detailed information on the range of reasonable accommodations covered by the Code is provided in the “Joint Statement of The Department of Housing and Urban Development and The Department of Justice’s Reasonable Accommodations Under the Fair Housing Act,” available at https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/DOC_7771.PDF

HUD Study, Discrimination Against Families with Children in Rental Housing Markets

Familial status is protected under the Fair Housing Act. The familial status protection applies to households with children under the age of 18, those in the process of adopting a child, and pregnant women.

HUD conducted a pilot study: comparing the treatment of renters with and without children through over 600 tests conducted in three different cities. The study found no evidence of outright refusal to rent to families with children, and very few differences in treatment overall.

However, the study found evidence of some subtle steering to larger units, an action that may increase costs and limit availability. Occupancy standards that limit occupancy to two persons per bedroom may also affect the opportunities available to families with children if such standards prevent consideration of smaller units that-in light of family composition, room size, or cost-might still be acceptably sized the family’s point of view.

Properties may consider providing increased flexibility regarding unit size and occupancy to further increase the rental housing available to families.